\nThought I\u2019d share with you some shooting stats from our last Chicago Wrecking Crew team shoot \u201cAssault on the HMS Bounty-ful\u201d \u2013 2016 version.
\n\tFirst some background to frame up the event.
\n\t–\tWe had a reserve table at a local casino \u2013 12 footer
\n\t–\tThe throwing conditions were void of distractions (late bets, arguing with box crew, people buying in, squeezers)
\n\t–\tThere were 6 shooters and 8 blockers \u2013 total 14 (two blockers "CF-ers" shot but did not keep their stats)
\n\t–\tThere were 20 individual rolls by the shooters
\n\t–\tThere was a total of 212 times the dice were tossed
\n\t–\t26 sevens were thrown, 6 of which were on come-outs
\n\t–\t10 of the 20 rolls did not qualify for the 5 count
\n\t–\tThere were 3 PSO\u2019s thrown out of 37 point cycles
\n\t–\tCollective SSR was 8.15 (212\/26) \/ SSR range 5.0 to 11.67
\n\t–\tWithout 7\u2019s on the come out SSR was 10.30 (206\/20) \/ SSR range 4.0 to 14.25
\n\t–\tTop 5 rolls were 36\/29\/28\/22\/18
\n\t–\tThere were 17 points made out of 37 point cycles
\n\t–\tBox numbers (4-5-6-8-9-10) thrown per shooter ranged from 64.29 to 88.89., average was 73.11 which is above the random distribution of 66.67%.
\n\t–\tInside numbers (5-6-8-9) thrown per shooter ranged from 46.67 to 61.11, average was 52.83 which is above the random distribution of 50%.
\n\tConclusion:
\n\t10 five-count non-qualifiers out of 20 for controlled shooters at the event supports the notion you should use 5 count on all shooters.<\/p>\n
\t** Question \u2013 at what sustained level would you not use the five count?<\/p>\n
\tSSR of 8.15 was 2.15 above norm of 6. It was well above the 6.23, therefore it was a statistical advantage for the attendees.<\/p>\n
\tBox numbers and inside numbers thrown show some control but not a high enough percentage, nor is the 212 an ideal sample size. The shooters still need to hone their skills.<\/p>\n
\tThere was no data gathered on whether come or place betting was better. But the prevailing sense was come betters fared slightly better. It depends on how much you press or how much odds you put behind.
\n\tDon\u2019t know if the 17 points made out of 37 point cycles is above or below the mark. I guess it depends on which points were established for the point cycle.<\/p>\n
\tAnyway, the team is still in its infancy and will continue to track its progress. We have another team shoot planned and will report out how much wrecking we do.<\/p>\n
\tScooter<\/p>\n
Posted by:<\/strong> Skinny on March 22, 2016, 10:50 pm<\/p>\n \tI would suggest one other stat if you are interested. I think it is worthwhile to find out which players made\/lost\/broke even. The best way to measure it is in terms of your initial amount at risk.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n Posted by:<\/strong> Scooter on March 22, 2016, 11:40 pm<\/p>\n \tAfter our team shoot at the comp-ed buffet, the team was polled as to win\/loss and how much. One of our blockers (still a novice) said he broke even. He was basically betting place bets single level and not pressing. He is still learning the ropes. Totally we collectively walked away with $28,400. One ATS bet of $25 across by a blocker netted him $6425. He ended up at $6500. The rest were all in the $1-2-3K range.<\/p>\n \tFor most of us it is far safer to throw in numbers\/teams. We’re trying to stay under the radar and avoid casino heat. Time will tell.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n Posted by:<\/strong> Skinny on March 23, 2016, 4:22 am<\/p>\n \tThat is great. I suspected it was a positive session and your winnings do indeed bear that out.<\/p>\n \tI also mentioned "initial amount at risk" as the yardstick against which you should be measuring your wins. I have 1 article and 2 posts I would like your team and you to review. After reading them you will understand why I am discussing this concept. It is a mathematical term that I am using here to give folks insight into how they can analyze their wins\/losses realistically. It gives you a measuring tool that can be helpful.<\/p>\n \tThis article describes the term "initial amount at risk" and how you can use it. \tThis post in the wisdom section may give some insight into what it takes to be successful at the tables.
\n\tYes, that is indeed the yardstick to measure the success.<\/p>\n
\n\tHow much should I be winning at the tables?<\/a><\/p>\n
\n\tMake your money on the 10+ to 20+ rolls<\/a><\/p>\n