Craps

Psychokinesis

Spread the love


Experiments were done in the 1960s about controlling dice with the mind. Do you think this is possible?


Replies:

Posted by: brothelman on October 8, 2012, 7:34 pm

Drew Barrymoore can do it she did it with fire to.

Posted by: Scan on October 8, 2012, 7:53 pm

Lol

Posted by: Skinny on October 8, 2012, 8:52 pm

"CharlesL" wrote: Experiments were done in the 1960s about controlling dice with the mind. Do you think this is possible?

No.

Posted by: Dogleg on October 8, 2012, 11:24 pm

Did it work in the 60s? I wonder why they stopped experimenting.

Posted by: Guest on October 9, 2012, 2:40 pm

They were using LSD as they recorded what they thought the results were. A few of the researchers also thought they were flying too.

Posted by: The Griz on October 9, 2012, 10:24 pm

There were alot of experiments done in the 60’s….
I liked the one where the men stared at goats…
😎 😆

the answer is, no, didn’t get proven to work with dice. Spoons, well, that one is still debatable. 😯

Posted by: the gman on October 9, 2012, 10:35 pm

ofcourse this works

you have to get up to the table, put a little more pressure on your right foot and stare real hard at the dice…. i dont mean a little hard, i mean real hard.

I know this works because i do it every day…. i stare real hard at the papers on my desk and pretty
soon i cant find all of them….hell i have been doing this for 35 years…. piece of cake

gman

Posted by: Guest on October 10, 2012, 3:31 am

I have not a damn thing using scientific proof methods to justify the following, et there is dynamic 1/2-truth to this: when participating in a game or using some type of gambling machine or other equipment whos results change your state of well being, there becomes a temporary creation of a fluid (always moving in a flux) energy system that easily *MAY* change the operation of said machine to yield results that vary away from then known statistics and probability. And often when you try to examine what is at play in more detail, the abberant behavior may change or even disappear.

Most sufficiently "awake" scientific observers who know hard lessons from how *expectations* for a certain set of experimental findings can mess up his or her experiment like the old saying of how you can be your own worst enemy. Since nobody understands the quantitative math behind this field, scientists with good reputations to nurture along will always have fear of being called a nut, eccentric, a dreamer, or a crackpot. Or they will pretend they have no idea what you are getting at [but in HEART OF HEARTS they will discuss it quite differently. This applies to maximum levels if that scientist is also a living example of something we currently classify as "supernatural" or potentially technology of alien (xeno) organism production. Do not try for a real conversation, the risk of sincere talk with a stranger is a very very serious and career-ending risk.

So then move all this over to how a persons mind may mix with the result of a thrown set of dice. If you develop a skill that seems to go a bit beyond the ststs, please discuss this with NO LIVING PERSON. DOCUMENT IT IN NO PLACE–EV ER–SO HELP YOU GOD. Remember that 1 person just might keep something a secret. More than one person, and the odds are far less than 1% probability.

Hey everybody. This subj. it too hot to talk about. Why not lets just never mention it ever again.

Posted by: Dogleg on October 10, 2012, 3:38 am

I’m seeing the words……….. but they don’t seem to be in an order that I recognise, or can make since of.

but thats not that uncommon for me.

Posted by: Skinny on October 10, 2012, 4:11 am

"lylastar" wrote:
Hey everybody…Why not lets just never mention it ever again.

I like to keep things simple. These are simple concepts that make the most sense to me.

Posted by: Guest on October 10, 2012, 5:10 am

Sorry I made lots of typos! Since the gist of what I was saying was that this is a category that causes negative attention or gets you into deep trouble…instead of correcting the msg typos let’s just forget about supernatural stuff. Real examples of extraordinary power can really f*ck you up! Only good policy is never talk about this, you can learn from yourself but others in these conservative closed-minded times will toast you alive with narry the slightest compassion or kindness. (my own life, at least, teaches the subject is way too hot to handle!). So I’ll never speak this category again. Others take your chances if you want to. I’ll just hush up here.

Posted by: brothelman on October 10, 2012, 5:30 am

But i have seen it done.

Posted by: Dogleg on October 10, 2012, 2:39 pm

Are these conservitive closed minded times? If they are I must be a Neandertal

Posted by: Guest on October 10, 2012, 3:28 pm

People who are conservative probably have a deep belief in the supernatural — God, etc. Psychokinesis could just be a physical ability. I have my doubts it exists but I don’t see anything supernatural about it.

Posted by: Finisher on September 4, 2013, 8:42 pm

😀 😀

Posted by: TheWall on September 4, 2013, 9:44 pm

I don’t believe in Psychokinesis but I will tell you this: If my point is an even number I focus on the hardway for that number. I think to myself "4,4", "4,4" and nothing else. If it is an odd point like a 5 I think to myself "3,2", "3,2". This may sound simplistic but it helps me block out some of the noise of what is going on around me. If feel it helps me shoot better.